It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHFBL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FNWD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFBL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
FNWD (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.43% price change this week, while HFBL (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
FNWD is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
HFBL is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
FNWD | HFBL | FNWD / HFBL | |
Capitalization | 106M | 40.4M | 262% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 23.005 | -4.565 | -504% |
P/E Ratio | 12.62 | 8.34 | 151% |
Revenue | 65.3M | 22.5M | 290% |
Total Cash | 23.2M | 7.57M | 306% |
Total Debt | 80M | 15M | 533% |
FNWD | HFBL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HFBL's Valuation (22) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNWD (27) in the null industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.
HFBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNWD (100) in the null industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.
FNWD's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (68) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNWD’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.
FNWD's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HFBL (53) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNWD’s stock grew similarly to HFBL’s over the last 12 months.
HFBL's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWD (68) in the null industry. This means that HFBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWD’s over the last 12 months.
FNWD | HFBL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago39% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago54% | 15 days ago54% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 3 days ago47% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FNWD and BVFL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNWD and BVFL's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FNWD | 100% | -1.68% | ||
BVFL - FNWD | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
FNRN - FNWD | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ORRF - FNWD | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
WTBFB - FNWD | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
MSBB - FNWD | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.46% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HFBL and FUSB have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HFBL and FUSB's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HFBL | 100% | +4.70% | ||
FUSB - HFBL | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
BCAL - HFBL | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.30% | ||
FNWD - HFBL | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
TFC - HFBL | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
FIBK - HFBL | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.10% | ||
More |