Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs GIRPX
FNWFX vs GIRPX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs GIRPX
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts I
Price$9.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
FNWFX vs GIRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. GIRPX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and GIRPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. GIRPX (2.22B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: GIRPX (1.29) vs FNWFX (1.21). FNWFX was incepted earlier than GIRPX: FNWFX (8 years) vs GIRPX (15 years). GIRPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: GIRPX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). GIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. FNWFX (3.79). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.68 vs. GIRPX (24.52).
| FNWFX | GIRPX | FNWFX / GIRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.09 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.26 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.128 | 5.807 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 2.22B | 2,878% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 4.90 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.93 | 19.04 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.68 | 24.52 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers