Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs HEMCX
FNWFX vs HEMCX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs HEMCX
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets C
Price$9.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.11M
FNWFX vs HEMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. HEMCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and HEMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. HEMCX (31.1M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than HEMCX: FNWFX (1.21) vs HEMCX (0.00). FNWFX was incepted earlier than HEMCX: FNWFX (8 years) vs HEMCX (14 years). HEMCX (3.42) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). HEMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). HEMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: HEMCX (2500) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.79 vs. HEMCX (1.22). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.68 vs. HEMCX (19.50).
| FNWFX | HEMCX | FNWFX / HEMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 3.42 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.128 | 3.741 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 31.1M | 205,145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 1.22 | 311% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.93 | 7.65 | 352% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.68 | 19.50 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers