Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNWFX vs HEMRX
FNWFX vs HEMRX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs HEMRX
American Funds New World F3
Price$89.79
Change+$0.55 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.56B
Janus Henderson Emerging Markets N
Price$10.42
Change+$0.08 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.67M
FNWFX vs HEMRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. HEMRX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and HEMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. HEMRX (21.7M). HEMRX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: HEMRX (1.68) vs FNWFX (1.09). FNWFX was incepted earlier than HEMRX: FNWFX (8 years) vs HEMRX (10 years). HEMRX (1.64) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). HEMRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). FNWFX (1000000) and HEMRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. FNWFX (11.86). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.35 vs. HEMRX (19.86).
| FNWFX | HEMRX | FNWFX / HEMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.04 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.64 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.580 | 14.380 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.6B | 21.7M | 325,346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.68 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.86 | 12.55 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.49 | 21.99 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.35 | 19.86 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |