Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs HEMZX
FNWFX vs HEMZX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs HEMZX
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$7.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets535.35M
FNWFX vs HEMZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. HEMZX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and HEMZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. HEMZX (535M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than HEMZX: FNWFX (1.21) vs HEMZX (0.00). FNWFX was incepted earlier than HEMZX: FNWFX (8 years) vs HEMZX (26 years). HEMZX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). HEMZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 125.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). HEMZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: HEMZX (2500) vs FNWFX (1000000). HEMZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. FNWFX (3.79). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.68 vs. HEMZX (-17.97).
| FNWFX | HEMZX | FNWFX / HEMZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.48 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.67 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.128 | 9.658 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 100 | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 535M | 11,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 6.03 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.93 | -4.90 | -550% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.68 | -17.97 | -215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -21.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...