Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs HHHSX
FNWFX vs HHHSX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs HHHSX
American Funds New World F3
Price$80.49
Change-$0.44 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.63B
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R4
Price$17.61
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.76B
FNWFX vs HHHSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. HHHSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a StrongBuy and HHHSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. HHHSX (6.76B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than HHHSX: FNWFX (1.56) vs HHHSX (1.08). FNWFX was incepted earlier than HHHSX: FNWFX (8 years) vs HHHSX (8 years). HHHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FNWFX (32.00). HHHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: HHHSX (0) vs FNWFX (1000000). HHHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. FNWFX (5.15). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. HHHSX (12.81).
| FNWFX | HHHSX | FNWFX / HHHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.505 | 5.576 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.6B | 6.76B | 941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.08 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.15 | 12.39 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.39 | -2.92 | -219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.14 | 12.81 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |