Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs PCEMX
FNWFX vs PCEMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs PCEMX
American Funds New World F3
Price$77.08
Change-$1.87 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.34B
PACE International Em Mkts Eq P
Price$13.23
Change-$0.29 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets403.25M
FNWFX vs PCEMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. PCEMX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Hold and PCEMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 62.3B vs. PCEMX (403M). FNWFX (1.23) and PCEMX (1.17) have matching dividends . FNWFX was incepted earlier than PCEMX: FNWFX (8 years) vs PCEMX (30 years). PCEMX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). PCEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FNWFX (37.00). PCEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: PCEMX (10000) vs FNWFX (1000000). PCEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.20 vs. FNWFX (-1.44). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.96 vs. PCEMX (43.85).
| FNWFX | PCEMX | FNWFX / PCEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.20 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.46 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.078 | 4.321 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.3B | 403M | 15,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.17 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.44 | 7.20 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.37 | 1.49 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.96 | 43.85 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...