Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs REEAX
FNWFX vs REEAX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs REEAX
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.52
Change+$0.18 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55B
RBC Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$13.89
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.33B
FNWFX vs REEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. REEAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and REEAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.6B vs. REEAX (4.33B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than REEAX: FNWFX (1.21) vs REEAX (0.48). FNWFX was incepted earlier than REEAX: FNWFX (8 years) vs REEAX (11 years). REEAX (2.11) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. REEAX (34.00). REEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: REEAX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). REEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.28 vs. FNWFX (3.55). REEAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.88 vs. FNWFX (38.31).
| FNWFX | REEAX | FNWFX / REEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.11 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.843 | 7.889 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.6B | 4.33B | 1,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.48 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.55 | 9.28 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.45 | 27.99 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.31 | 42.88 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.63 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers