Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs RREMX
FNWFX vs RREMX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs RREMX
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
RBC Emerging Markets Equity R6
Price$14.22
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.33B
FNWFX vs RREMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. RREMX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and RREMX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. RREMX (4.33B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than RREMX: FNWFX (1.21) vs RREMX (0.88). FNWFX was incepted earlier than RREMX: FNWFX (8 years) vs RREMX (8 years). RREMX (0.88) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RREMX (34.00). RREMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: RREMX (250000) vs FNWFX (1000000). RREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.63 vs. FNWFX (3.79). RREMX return over 5 years is better than : 44.65 vs. FNWFX (38.68).
| FNWFX | RREMX | FNWFX / RREMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.88 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.88 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.128 | 7.891 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250000 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 4.33B | 1,472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.88 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 9.63 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.93 | 30.79 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.68 | 44.65 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers