Ad is loading...
FNWFX vs TSMGX
FNWFX vs TSMGX Comparison
Open Charts FNWFX vs TSMGX
American Funds New World F3
Price$81.74
Change+$0.22 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.85B
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr A
Price$15.19
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
FNWFX vs TSMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNWFX vs. TSMGX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWFX is a Buy and TSMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.8B vs. TSMGX (1.88B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than TSMGX: FNWFX (1.21) vs TSMGX (0.00). FNWFX was incepted earlier than TSMGX: FNWFX (8 years) vs TSMGX (6 years). TSMGX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TSMGX (17.00). TSMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: TSMGX (2500) vs FNWFX (1000000). TSMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. FNWFX (3.79). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.68 vs. TSMGX (17.98).
| FNWFX | TSMGX | FNWFX / TSMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.44 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.57 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.128 | 7.807 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 63.8B | 1.88B | 3,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.79 | 6.90 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.93 | 19.89 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.68 | 17.98 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |