Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFQX vs MSNCX
FOFQX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FOFQX vs MSNCX
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A
Price$10.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets802.13M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets465.86M
FOFQX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFQX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFQX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFQX has more cash in the bank: 802M vs. MSNCX (466M). MSNCX (3.27) and FOFQX (3.26) have matching dividends . FOFQX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FOFQX (7 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MSNCX (0.86) and FOFQX (0.82) have similar cost to investors . MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FOFQX (11.31). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FOFQX (4%) vs FOFQX (4%). FOFQX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.10 vs. FOFQX (-0.12). FOFQX (-5.43) and MSNCX (-5.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FOFQX | MSNCX | FOFQX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.84 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.86 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.459 | -1.560 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 802M | 466M | 172% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 3.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.12 | -0.10 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.33 | 5.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.43 | -5.71 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement