Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFQX vs MSNCX
FOFQX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FOFQX vs MSNCX
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A
Price$10.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets786.12M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.34
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.11M
FOFQX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFQX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jul 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFQX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFQX has more cash in the bank: 786M vs. MSNCX (466M). MSNCX (3.27) and FOFQX (3.26) have matching dividends . FOFQX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FOFQX (7 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FOFQX (0.81). MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FOFQX (11.31). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FOFQX (4%) vs FOFQX (4%). FOFQX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FOFQX (-2.25) and MSNCX (-2.25) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.11 vs. FOFQX (-7.93).
| FOFQX | MSNCX | FOFQX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.84 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.86 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.013 | -3.063 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 786M | 466M | 169% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.26 | 3.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.25 | -2.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.18 | 1.56 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.93 | -1.11 | 717% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers