Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FOFQX vs MSNCX
FOFQX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FOFQX vs MSNCX
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A
Price$10.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets809.9M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.46
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets452.69M
FOFQX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFQX vs. MSNCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFQX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFQX has more cash in the bank: 810M vs. MSNCX (453M). MSNCX (3.22) and FOFQX (3.20) have matching dividends . FOFQX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FOFQX (7 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). MSNCX (0.86) and FOFQX (0.82) have similar cost to investors . MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FOFQX (11.31). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FOFQX (4%) vs FOFQX (4%). FOFQX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.70 vs. FOFQX (0.49). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. FOFQX (-5.57).
| FOFQX | MSNCX | FOFQX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.84 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.86 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.022 | -1.922 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 453M | 179% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 3.22 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.49 | 0.70 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.62 | 6.78 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.57 | 3.45 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement