Ad is loading...
FOFQX vs NMDAX
FOFQX vs NMDAX Comparison
Open Charts FOFQX vs NMDAX
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A
Price$10.12
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets807.95M
Nuveen MD Municipal Bond A
Price$9.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets243.54M
FOFQX vs NMDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FOFQX vs. NMDAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOFQX is a Hold and NMDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOFQX has more cash in the bank: 808M vs. NMDAX (244M). NMDAX pays higher dividends than FOFQX: NMDAX (3.40) vs FOFQX (3.14). FOFQX was incepted earlier than NMDAX: FOFQX (7 years) vs NMDAX (31 years). NMDAX (0.83) and FOFQX (0.82) have similar cost to investors . NMDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FOFQX (15.03). NMDAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FOFQX (4%) vs FOFQX (4%). FOFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMDAX: FOFQX (1000) vs NMDAX (2500). NMDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.65 vs. FOFQX (0.45). NMDAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.48 vs. FOFQX (-4.37).
| FOFQX | NMDAX | FOFQX / NMDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.83 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.83 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.968 | -2.724 | 109% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 89% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 808M | 244M | 331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 3.40 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.45 | 0.65 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.52 | 3.78 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.37 | 4.48 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...