FOR
Price
$22.76
Change
-$0.28 (-1.22%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
54 days until earnings call
HHH
Price
$73.20
Change
-$0.69 (-0.93%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.65B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FOR vs HHH

Header iconFOR vs HHH Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs HHHBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$22.76
Change-$0.28 (-1.22%)
Volume$161.56K
Capitalization1.99B
Howard Hughes Holdings
Price$73.20
Change-$0.69 (-0.93%)
Volume$624.11K
Capitalization3.65B
FOR vs HHH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HHH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. HHH commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and HHH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $23.04 vs. HHH: $73.89)
Brand notoriety: FOR and HHH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 101% vs. HHH: 170%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. HHH: $3.65B
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. HHH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $3.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHHH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HHH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HHH is a better buy in the long-term than FOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HHH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HHH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than HHH.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.49% price change this week, while HHH (@Real Estate Development) price change was -1.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

HHH is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HHH($3.65B) has a higher market cap than FOR($1.99B). HHH has higher P/E ratio than FOR: HHH (31.15) vs FOR (10.84). HHH YTD gains are higher at: -3.939 vs. FOR (-11.111). FOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. HHH (-342.2M). HHH has more cash in the bank: 632M vs. FOR (459M). FOR has less debt than HHH: FOR (714M) vs HHH (5.35B). FOR has higher revenues than HHH: FOR (1.53B) vs HHH (1.02B).
FORHHHFOR / HHH
Capitalization1.99B3.65B54%
EBITDA230M-342.2M-67%
Gain YTD-11.111-3.939282%
P/E Ratio10.8431.1535%
Revenue1.53B1.02B149%
Total Cash459M632M73%
Total Debt714M5.35B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR vs HHH: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
HHH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
6187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8464
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HHH's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FOR (70) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that HHH’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as HHH (100) in the null industry. This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to HHH’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's SMR Rating (61) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as HHH (87) in the null industry. This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to HHH’s over the last 12 months.

HHH's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as FOR (86) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that HHH’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

HHH's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as FOR (84) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that HHH’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORHHH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HHH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABECX21.500.07
+0.33%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq C
FSMRX34.41N/A
N/A
Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth R
LCSTX26.65N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders FI
PWETX13.91N/A
N/A
PACE International Em Mkts Eq P2
FWMIX65.02-0.20
-0.31%
American Funds Washington Mutual F3

HHH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HHH has been loosely correlated with JOE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HHH jumps, then JOE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HHH
1D Price
Change %
HHH100%
+0.57%
JOE - HHH
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
STHO - HHH
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
CWK - HHH
48%
Loosely correlated
-5.99%
NMRK - HHH
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
MMI - HHH
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More