FOR
Price
$20.01
Change
+$0.63 (+3.25%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
78 days until earnings call
MITEY
Price
$17.86
Change
+$0.27 (+1.53%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
15.84B
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FOR vs MITEY

Header iconFOR vs MITEY Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs MITEYBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$20.01
Change+$0.63 (+3.25%)
Volume$167.13K
Capitalization1.99B
Mitsubishi Estate
Price$17.86
Change+$0.27 (+1.53%)
Volume$39.58K
Capitalization15.84B
FOR vs MITEY Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MITEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. MITEY commentary
May 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and MITEY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $20.01 vs. MITEY: $17.86)
Brand notoriety: FOR and MITEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 73% vs. MITEY: 69%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. MITEY: $15.84B
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. MITEY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $15.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMITEY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MITEY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MITEY is a better buy in the long-term than FOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MITEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MITEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than MITEY.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.88% price change this week, while MITEY (@Real Estate Development) price change was +4.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

MITEY is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.96% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MITEY($15.8B) has a higher market cap than FOR($1.99B). MITEY has higher P/E ratio than FOR: MITEY (13.59) vs FOR (10.84). MITEY YTD gains are higher at: 28.397 vs. FOR (-22.801). MITEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 396B vs. FOR (230M). MITEY has more cash in the bank: 1.05T vs. FOR (459M). FOR has less debt than MITEY: FOR (714M) vs MITEY (3.02T). MITEY has higher revenues than FOR: MITEY (1.35T) vs FOR (1.53B).
FORMITEYFOR / MITEY
Capitalization1.99B15.8B13%
EBITDA230M396B0%
Gain YTD-22.80128.397-80%
P/E Ratio10.8413.5980%
Revenue1.53B1.35T0%
Total Cash459M1.05T0%
Total Debt714M3.02T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR vs MITEY: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
MITEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6657
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7790
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOR's Valuation (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MITEY (93) in the null industry. This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to MITEY’s over the last 12 months.

MITEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FOR (66) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MITEY’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

MITEY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FOR (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MITEY’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

MITEY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOR (84) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MITEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOR’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MITEY (90) in the null industry. This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to MITEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORMITEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MITEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIOX24.940.63
+2.59%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts Instl
PEMQX15.380.31
+2.06%
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity R6
RTNCX12.280.19
+1.57%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed Intl Eq C
WFATX37.660.24
+0.64%
Allspring Index Asset Allocation Instl
GMAOX11.63N/A
N/A
GMO Quality Cyclicals I

MITEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MITEY has been loosely correlated with MTSFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MITEY jumps, then MTSFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MITEY
1D Price
Change %
MITEY100%
+1.53%
MTSFY - MITEY
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
DWAHY - MITEY
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
FOR - MITEY
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
MITEF - MITEY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHH - MITEY
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
More