FOR
Price
$22.76
Change
-$0.28 (-1.22%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
54 days until earnings call
MMI
Price
$37.48
Change
-$1.18 (-3.05%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.32B
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FOR vs MMI

Header iconFOR vs MMI Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs MMIBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$22.76
Change-$0.28 (-1.22%)
Volume$161.56K
Capitalization1.99B
Marcus & Millichap
Price$37.48
Change-$1.18 (-3.05%)
Volume$116.03K
Capitalization1.32B
FOR vs MMI Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. MMI commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and MMI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $23.04 vs. MMI: $38.66)
Brand notoriety: FOR and MMI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 101% vs. MMI: 130%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. MMI: $1.32B
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. MMI’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMI is a better buy in the long-term than FOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMI’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MMI’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMI is a better buy in the short-term than FOR.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.49% price change this week, while MMI (@Real Estate Development) price change was +3.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

MMI is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.21% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOR($1.99B) has a higher market cap than MMI($1.32B). MMI has higher P/E ratio than FOR: MMI (80.00) vs FOR (10.84). MMI YTD gains are higher at: 1.045 vs. FOR (-11.111). FOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. MMI (-25.89M). FOR has more cash in the bank: 459M vs. MMI (349M). MMI has less debt than FOR: MMI (87.7M) vs FOR (714M). FOR has higher revenues than MMI: FOR (1.53B) vs MMI (646M).
FORMMIFOR / MMI
Capitalization1.99B1.32B150%
EBITDA230M-25.89M-889%
Gain YTD-11.1111.045-1,063%
P/E Ratio10.8480.0014%
Revenue1.53B646M236%
Total Cash459M349M132%
Total Debt714M87.7M814%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR vs MMI: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
MMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
569
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8182
SMR RATING
1..100
6191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
842
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOR's Valuation (70) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (75). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (82). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's SMR Rating (61) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MMI (91). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to MMI’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FOR (86). This means that MMI’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

MMI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOR (84). This means that MMI’s stock grew significantly faster than FOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORMMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGNCX27.46N/A
N/A
Victory Global Energy Transition C
FELTX80.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors M
RUDAX18.81N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Sm Cp Val A
PMAQX46.67N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap R6
FIMVX28.12N/A
N/A
Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index