FOR
Price
$19.74
Change
-$0.70 (-3.42%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
37 days until earnings call
OSIS
Price
$229.54
Change
-$7.04 (-2.98%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.85B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOR vs OSIS

Header iconFOR vs OSIS Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs OSISBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$19.74
Change-$0.70 (-3.42%)
Volume$123.96K
Capitalization1.99B
OSI Systems
Price$229.54
Change-$7.04 (-2.98%)
Volume$247.46K
Capitalization3.85B
FOR vs OSIS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSIS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. OSIS commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a Hold and OSIS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $19.74 vs. OSIS: $229.54)
Brand notoriety: FOR and OSIS are both not notable
FOR represents the Real Estate Development, while OSIS is part of the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 68% vs. OSIS: 121%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. OSIS: $3.85B
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. OSIS’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $3.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $111.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOSIS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OSIS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OSIS is a better buy in the long-term than FOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSIS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OSIS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than OSIS.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.08% price change this week, while OSIS (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

OSIS is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+1.16% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

@Electronic Components (+2.02% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OSIS($3.85B) has a higher market cap than FOR($1.99B). OSIS has higher P/E ratio than FOR: OSIS (27.89) vs FOR (10.84). OSIS YTD gains are higher at: 37.096 vs. FOR (-23.843). OSIS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 252M vs. FOR (230M). FOR has more cash in the bank: 459M vs. OSIS (95.8M). OSIS has less debt than FOR: OSIS (629M) vs FOR (714M). OSIS has higher revenues than FOR: OSIS (1.69B) vs FOR (1.53B).
FOROSISFOR / OSIS
Capitalization1.99B3.85B52%
EBITDA230M252M91%
Gain YTD-23.84337.096-64%
P/E Ratio10.8427.8939%
Revenue1.53B1.69B90%
Total Cash459M95.8M479%
Total Debt714M629M114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR vs OSIS: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
OSIS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1088
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
776
SMR RATING
1..100
6451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8115
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OSIS's Valuation (69) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FOR (79) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that OSIS’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

OSIS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOR (77) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that OSIS’s stock grew significantly faster than FOR’s over the last 12 months.

OSIS's SMR Rating (51) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is in the same range as FOR (64) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that OSIS’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

OSIS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOR (81) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that OSIS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOR’s over the last 12 months.

OSIS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Electronic Equipment Or Instruments industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOR (81) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that OSIS’s stock grew significantly faster than FOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOROSIS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSIS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGQPX22.32-0.25
-1.11%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth P
CNGFX63.51-0.87
-1.35%
American Funds New Economy 529F
FWWFX34.77-0.51
-1.45%
Fidelity Worldwide
FSSEX11.98-0.20
-1.64%
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Intl Eq
TARZX24.14-0.41
-1.67%
Third Avenue Real Estate Value Z

FOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOR has been loosely correlated with JOE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOR jumps, then JOE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOR
1D Price
Change %
FOR100%
-3.42%
JOE - FOR
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
CWK - FOR
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.61%
MMI - FOR
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.08%
HHH - FOR
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
RMR - FOR
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
More

OSIS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSIS has been loosely correlated with KN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSIS jumps, then KN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSIS
1D Price
Change %
OSIS100%
-2.98%
KN - OSIS
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
LFUS - OSIS
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.60%
LYTS - OSIS
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
CTS - OSIS
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
BELFB - OSIS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
More