FOR
Price
$20.15
Change
+$0.24 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
24 days until earnings call
RMAX
Price
$8.51
Change
+$0.04 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
160.28M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOR vs RMAX

Header iconFOR vs RMAX Comparison
Open Charts FOR vs RMAXBanner chart's image
Forestar Group
Price$20.15
Change+$0.24 (+1.21%)
Volume$281.65K
Capitalization1.99B
Re/Max Holdings
Price$8.51
Change+$0.04 (+0.47%)
Volume$355.78K
Capitalization160.28M
FOR vs RMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOR vs. RMAX commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOR is a StrongBuy and RMAX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FOR: $20.15 vs. RMAX: $8.51)
Brand notoriety: FOR and RMAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOR: 157% vs. RMAX: 177%
Market capitalization -- FOR: $1.99B vs. RMAX: $160.28M
FOR [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.99B. RMAX’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $160.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMAX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RMAX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMAX is a better buy in the long-term than FOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMAX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RMAX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FOR is a better buy in the short-term than RMAX.

Price Growth

FOR (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +3.39% price change this week, while RMAX (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

RMAX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.74% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOR($1.99B) has a higher market cap than RMAX($160M). RMAX has higher P/E ratio than FOR: RMAX (1111.11) vs FOR (10.84). RMAX YTD gains are higher at: -20.244 vs. FOR (-22.261). FOR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 230M vs. RMAX (26.6M). FOR has more cash in the bank: 459M vs. RMAX (82.6M). RMAX has less debt than FOR: RMAX (484M) vs FOR (714M). FOR has higher revenues than RMAX: FOR (1.53B) vs RMAX (326M).
FORRMAXFOR / RMAX
Capitalization1.99B160M1,242%
EBITDA230M26.6M865%
Gain YTD-22.261-20.244110%
P/E Ratio10.841111.111%
Revenue1.53B326M468%
Total Cash459M82.6M556%
Total Debt714M484M148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOR vs RMAX: Fundamental Ratings
FOR
RMAX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1219
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
6587
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7980
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMAX's Valuation (39) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOR (79). This means that RMAX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOR’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (100). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's SMR Rating (65) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (87). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

RMAX's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FOR (63). This means that RMAX’s stock grew similarly to FOR’s over the last 12 months.

FOR's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as RMAX (80). This means that FOR’s stock grew similarly to RMAX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORRMAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGTYX78.43N/A
N/A
Putnam Global Technology Y
FRIRX12.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income I
FVILX5.98N/A
N/A
Forester Value I
GMVIX16.31N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity Inv
FLXSX15.67N/A
N/A
Fidelity Flex Small Cap Index