Advertisement
FORL vs ISRL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORL is a Hold and ISRL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FORL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileISRL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FORL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ISRL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
FORL (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +1.93% price change this week, while ISRL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +2.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
FORL is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
ISRL is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.87% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| FORL | ISRL | FORL / ISRL | |
| Capitalization | 73.2M | 139M | 53% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -1.05M | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.685 | 11.796 | 40% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.23 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 672K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
ISRL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 62 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
Advertisement
FORL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FORL and IROH have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORL and IROH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORL | 100% | +1.57% | ||
| IROH - FORL | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.29% | ||
| PLTYF - FORL | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISRL - FORL | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| HSPO - FORL | 17% Poorly correlated | +4.43% | ||
| SZZL - FORL | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||
ISRL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ISRL has been loosely correlated with HAIUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ISRL jumps, then HAIUF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISRL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISRL | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| HAIUF - ISRL | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SVII - ISRL | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| TBMC - ISRL | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
| DIST - ISRL | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLBR - ISRL | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||