FORL
Price
$11.04
Change
-$0.06 (-0.54%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
TBMC
Price
$11.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

FORL vs TBMC

Header iconFORL vs TBMC Comparison
Open Charts FORL vs TBMCBanner chart's image
Four Leaf Acquisition
Price$11.04
Change-$0.06 (-0.54%)
Volume$2.64K
CapitalizationN/A
Trailblazer Merger
Price$11.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.01K
CapitalizationN/A
FORL vs TBMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FORL vs. TBMC commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORL is a Hold and TBMC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (FORL: $11.04 vs. TBMC: $11.11)
Brand notoriety: FORL and TBMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FORL: 15% vs. TBMC: 76%
Market capitalization -- FORL: $73.23M vs. TBMC: $95.58M
FORL [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $73.23M. TBMC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $95.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FORL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FORL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TBMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FORL is a better buy in the long-term than TBMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FORL’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FORL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • TBMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TBMC is a better buy in the short-term than FORL.

Price Growth

FORL (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while TBMC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+2.31% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TBMC($95.6M) has a higher market cap than FORL($73.2M). TBMC YTD gains are higher at: 6.215 vs. FORL (4.943).
FORLTBMCFORL / TBMC
Capitalization73.2M95.6M77%
EBITDAN/A-641.8K-
Gain YTD4.9436.21580%
P/E RatioN/A55.79-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A676K-
Total DebtN/A325K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FORLTBMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FORL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TBMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OTCYX102.051.34
+1.33%
Invesco Discovery Large Cap Y
CMJIX42.310.31
+0.74%
Calvert US Mid Cap Core Rspnb Idx I
MAGRX28.940.11
+0.38%
BlackRock Natural Resources Instl
ICEIX20.790.04
+0.19%
Delaware Ivy International Core Eq I
LHCVX19.71N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Health Care R6

FORL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FORL and AFARU have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FORL and AFARU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORL
1D Price
Change %
FORL100%
-0.54%
AFARU - FORL
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLTYF - FORL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TBMC - FORL
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WINVU - FORL
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPXX - FORL
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
More

TBMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TBMC and IVCB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBMC and IVCB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TBMC
1D Price
Change %
TBMC100%
N/A
IVCB - TBMC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCVIU - TBMC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NVAC - TBMC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPCS - TBMC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLBR - TBMC
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More