Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPACX vs HRAFX
FPACX vs HRAFX Comparison
Open Charts FPACX vs HRAFX
Hartford Moderately Aggressive Allc F
Price$15.68
Change-$0.10 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets557.76M
FPACX vs HRAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPACX vs. HRAFX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPACX is a StrongBuy and HRAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. HRAFX (558M). FPACX (2.00) and HRAFX (1.92) have matching dividends . FPACX was incepted earlier than HRAFX: FPACX (32 years) vs HRAFX (8 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HRAFX (0.68). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. HRAFX (9.00). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRAFX: FPACX (1500) vs HRAFX (1000000). HRAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. FPACX (6.34). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.31 vs. HRAFX (40.05).
| FPACX | HRAFX | FPACX / HRAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.68 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.68 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.239 | 8.603 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 558M | 1,989% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.92 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 9.96 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.64 | 39.69 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.31 | 40.05 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers