Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCCX vs FPFZX
FPCCX vs FPFZX Comparison
Open Charts FPCCX vs FPFZX
Nuveen PA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.76
Change-$0.04 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.15M
Franklin PA Tax-Free Income Adv
Price$8.47
Change-$0.04 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets673.29M
FPCCX vs FPFZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCCX vs. FPFZX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCCX is a Hold and FPFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPFZX has more cash in the bank: 673M vs. FPCCX (343M). FPFZX pays higher dividends than FPCCX: FPFZX (3.44) vs FPCCX (2.40). FPCCX was incepted earlier than FPFZX: FPCCX (11 years) vs FPFZX (16 years). FPCCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FPFZX (0.59). FPCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FPFZX (18.22). FPCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPFZX: FPCCX (2500) vs FPFZX (100000). FPFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.35 vs. FPCCX (-1.76). FPCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.91 vs. FPFZX (-4.61).
| FPCCX | FPFZX | FPCCX / FPFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.59 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.59 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.483 | -2.528 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343M | 673M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 3.44 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.76 | 0.35 | -507% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.36 | 4.34 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.91 | -4.61 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.92 | -5.85 | -50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement