Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCCX vs FPFZX
FPCCX vs FPFZX Comparison
Open Charts FPCCX vs FPFZX
Nuveen PA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.09M
Franklin PA Tax-Free Income Adv
Price$8.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets670.38M
FPCCX vs FPFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCCX vs. FPFZX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCCX is a Hold and FPFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPFZX has more cash in the bank: 670M vs. FPCCX (342M). FPFZX pays higher dividends than FPCCX: FPFZX (3.50) vs FPCCX (2.46). FPCCX was incepted earlier than FPFZX: FPCCX (11 years) vs FPFZX (16 years). FPCCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FPFZX (0.59). FPCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FPFZX (18.22). FPCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPFZX: FPCCX (2500) vs FPFZX (100000). FPFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.74 vs. FPCCX (-2.73). FPCCX (-4.68) and FPFZX (-4.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FPCCX | FPFZX | FPCCX / FPFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.59 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.59 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.844 | -1.935 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342M | 670M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.50 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.73 | -0.74 | 370% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.79 | 3.45 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.68 | -4.71 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.78 | -4.35 | -87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers