Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCCX vs FRPRX
FPCCX vs FRPRX Comparison
Open Charts FPCCX vs FRPRX
Nuveen PA Municipal Bond C
Price$9.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.09M
Franklin PA Tax-Free Income R6
Price$8.48
Change-$0.02 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets668.68M
FPCCX vs FRPRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCCX vs. FRPRX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCCX is a Hold and FRPRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRPRX has more cash in the bank: 669M vs. FPCCX (342M). FRPRX pays higher dividends than FPCCX: FRPRX (3.52) vs FPCCX (2.45). FPCCX was incepted earlier than FRPRX: FPCCX (11 years) vs FRPRX (8 years). FPCCX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FRPRX (0.55). FPCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FRPRX (18.22). FPCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRPRX: FPCCX (2500) vs FRPRX (1000000). FRPRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.09 vs. FPCCX (-3.16). FPCCX return over 5 years is better than : -4.72 vs. FRPRX (-5.02).
| FPCCX | FRPRX | FPCCX / FRPRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.55 | 293% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.55 | 293% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.463 | -2.553 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342M | 669M | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.52 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.16 | -1.09 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.38 | 5.22 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.72 | -5.02 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers