Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs HRAFX
FPCSX vs HRAFX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs HRAFX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$42.57
Change+$0.25 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.76B
Hartford Moderately Aggressive Allc F
Price$15.32
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets544.74M
FPCSX vs HRAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. HRAFX commentary
Jun 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and HRAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. HRAFX (545M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than HRAFX: FPCSX (2.84) vs HRAFX (1.99). FPCSX was incepted earlier than HRAFX: FPCSX (5 years) vs HRAFX (8 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than HRAFX (0.68). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. HRAFX (9.00). HRAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: HRAFX (1000000) vs FPCSX (100000000). HRAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. FPCSX (4.67).
| FPCSX | HRAFX | FPCSX / HRAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.68 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.68 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.764 | 5.437 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 545M | 1,982% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.84 | 1.99 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.67 | 10.14 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.73 | 25.13 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 36.08 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement