Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs NDMSX
FPCSX vs NDMSX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs NDMSX
FPCSX vs NDMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. NDMSX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Hold and NDMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. NDMSX (900M). NDMSX pays higher dividends than FPCSX: NDMSX (3.76) vs FPCSX (2.65). FPCSX was incepted earlier than NDMSX: FPCSX (6 years) vs NDMSX (26 years). FPCSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than NDMSX (0.92). NDMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.63 vs. FPCSX (23.00). NDMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: NDMSX (50000) vs FPCSX (100000000). NDMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.69 vs. FPCSX (6.32). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.35 vs. NDMSX (7.90).
| FPCSX | NDMSX | FPCSX / NDMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.92 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.92 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.186 | 9.036 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 50000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.4B | 900M | 1,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 3.76 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.32 | 10.69 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.14 | 19.16 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 7.90 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement