Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs RPFCX
FPCSX vs RPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs RPFCX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$43.42
Change+$0.09 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.14B
Davis Balanced Fund A
Price$63.49
Change-$0.15 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.52M
FPCSX vs RPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. RPFCX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and RPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. RPFCX (270M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than RPFCX: FPCSX (1.99) vs RPFCX (1.49). FPCSX was incepted earlier than RPFCX: FPCSX (5 years) vs RPFCX (33 years). FPCSX (1.02) and RPFCX (0.98) have similar cost to investors . RPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FPCSX (10.00). RPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: RPFCX (1000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. RPFCX (5.11).
| FPCSX | RPFCX | FPCSX / RPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.98 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.98 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.169 | 8.778 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 270M | 4,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.49 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 5.11 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.84 | 42.34 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 75.07 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 95.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers