Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs RPFCX
FPCSX vs RPFCX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs RPFCX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$41.59
Change-$0.10 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.32B
Davis Balanced Fund A
Price$60.96
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.07M
FPCSX vs RPFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. RPFCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and RPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. RPFCX (260M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than RPFCX: FPCSX (2.95) vs RPFCX (1.54). FPCSX was incepted earlier than RPFCX: FPCSX (5 years) vs RPFCX (33 years). FPCSX (1.02) and RPFCX (0.98) have similar cost to investors . RPFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FPCSX (10.00). RPFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: RPFCX (1000) vs FPCSX (100000000). RPFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. FPCSX (2.46).
| FPCSX | RPFCX | FPCSX / RPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.98 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.98 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.578 | 4.065 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 1000 | 10,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 260M | 3,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 1.54 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.46 | 2.65 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.36 | 31.21 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 80.63 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers