Ad is loading...
FPGLX vs RBEDX
FPGLX vs RBEDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPGLX vs. RBEDX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPGLX is a Hold and RBEDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEDX has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. FPGLX (2B). FPGLX pays higher dividends than RBEDX: FPGLX (2.63) vs RBEDX (2.05). FPGLX was incepted earlier than RBEDX: FPGLX (8 years) vs RBEDX (11 years). RBEDX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FPGLX (0.34). FPGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RBEDX (10.00). FPGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEDX: FPGLX (0) vs RBEDX (250). RBEDX (7.23) and FPGLX (6.91) have marching annual gain over last year. RBEDX return over 5 years is better than : 23.50 vs. FPGLX (18.56).
| FPGLX | RBEDX | FPGLX / RBEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.11 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.11 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.447 | 2.701 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 32.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.05 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 7.23 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.30 | 11.87 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.56 | 23.50 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers