Ad is loading...
FPGLX vs REDTX
FPGLX vs REDTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPGLX vs. REDTX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPGLX is a Hold and REDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REDTX has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. FPGLX (2B). REDTX (2.73) and FPGLX (2.63) have matching dividends . FPGLX was incepted earlier than REDTX: FPGLX (8 years) vs REDTX (18 years). REDTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FPGLX (0.34). FPGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. REDTX (10.00). FPGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than REDTX: FPGLX (0) vs REDTX (250). REDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.14 vs. FPGLX (6.91). REDTX return over 5 years is better than : 27.59 vs. FPGLX (18.56).
| FPGLX | REDTX | FPGLX / REDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.36 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.36 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.447 | 2.951 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2B | 32.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.73 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.91 | 8.14 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.30 | 14.13 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.56 | 27.59 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers