Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPHAX vs FSPHX
FPHAX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPHAX vs. FSPHX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPHAX is a Buy and FSPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.74B vs. FPHAX (1.05B). FPHAX pays higher dividends than FSPHX: FPHAX (1.37) vs FSPHX (0.02). FPHAX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FPHAX (24 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FPHAX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FPHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. FSPHX (40.00). FPHAX (0) and FSPHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.88 vs. FPHAX (-16.07). FPHAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.86 vs. FSPHX (-18.90).
| FPHAX | FSPHX | FPHAX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.63 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.731 | -6.936 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 5.74B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 0.02 | 7,698% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.07 | -14.88 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.01 | -9.67 | -62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.86 | -18.90 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.65 | 6.75 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement