Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPUKX vs RLBAX
FPUKX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FPUKX vs RLBAX
FPUKX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPUKX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPUKX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FPUKX (32.9B). FPUKX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FPUKX (1.63) vs RLBAX (1.13). FPUKX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FPUKX (18 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FPUKX (0.40). FPUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). FPUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FPUKX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.72 vs. FPUKX (10.95). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.85 vs. FPUKX (5.93).
| FPUKX | RLBAX | FPUKX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.32 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.32 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.698 | 9.555 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.9B | 283B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.13 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.95 | 11.72 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.48 | 41.70 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.93 | 29.85 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.81 | 73.93 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers