Ad is loading...
FQAL vs RECS
FQAL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FQAL vs RECS
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$60.09
Change-$2.06 (-3.32%)
Volume$200
Net Assets930.75M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$31.03
Change-$1.09 (-3.39%)
Volume$14.78K
Net Assets2.25B
FQAL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQAL vs. RECS commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQAL is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.25B vs. FQAL (931M). FQAL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: FQAL (-4.734) vs RECS (-7.221). FQAL was incepted earlier than RECS: FQAL (9 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FQAL (0.16). RECS has a higher turnover FQAL (34.00) vs FQAL (34.00).
| FQAL | RECS | FQAL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -4.734 | -7.221 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 931M | 2.25B | 41% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.15 | 107% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 49.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 1.28 | 0.73 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FQAL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | +8.47% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 78% Closely correlated | +13.44% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +9.89% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 67% Closely correlated | +12.80% | ||
| BKNG - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | +10.86% | ||
| SPGI - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | +7.36% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +9.25% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +11.98% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +14.25% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +10.13% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +11.30% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +13.58% | ||
More | ||||