Ad is loading...
FQAL vs RECS
FQAL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FQAL vs RECS
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$66.22
Change+$0.38 (+0.58%)
Volume$470
CapitalizationN/A
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.17
Change+$0.26 (+0.74%)
Volume$1.3K
CapitalizationN/A
FQAL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQAL vs. RECS commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQAL is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.54B vs. FQAL (1.07B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FQAL: RECS (26.839) vs FQAL (22.689). FQAL was incepted earlier than RECS: FQAL (8 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS (45.00) and FQAL (43.00) have matching turnover.
| FQAL | RECS | FQAL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 22.689 | 26.839 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 1.54B | 70% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 45.00 | 96% |
| Yield | 1.18 | 0.89 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FQAL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | +1.19% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| SPGI - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| AMAT - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| LRCX - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| CPRT - FQAL | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||