Ad is loading...
FQAL vs RECS
FQAL vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FQAL vs RECS
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$64.70
Change-$0.11 (-0.17%)
Volume$224
Net Assets1B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$33.46
Change+$0.29 (+0.87%)
Volume$396.89K
Net Assets2.57B
FQAL vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQAL vs. RECS commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQAL is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.57B vs. FQAL (1B). FQAL has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: FQAL (-0.641) vs RECS (-3.351). FQAL was incepted earlier than RECS: FQAL (9 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FQAL (0.16). RECS has a higher turnover FQAL (34.00) vs FQAL (34.00).
| FQAL | RECS | FQAL / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -0.641 | -3.351 | 19% |
| Net Assets | 1B | 2.57B | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.16 | 0.15 | 107% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 49.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 1.29 | 0.73 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FQAL | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 79% Closely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LIN - FQAL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| BKNG - FQAL | 66% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||