67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FQAL vs SEIC
FQAL vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts FQAL vs SEIC
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Price$64.65
Change-$0.16 (-0.25%)
Volume$38.19K
Net Assets1.01B
SEI Investments
Price$81.54
Change+$0.20 (+0.25%)
Volume$429.67K
Capitalization9.3B
FQAL vs SEIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQAL vs. SEIC commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQAL is a Buy and SEIC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FQAL | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FQAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQAL has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FQAL jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FQAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQAL | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| PH - FQAL | 79% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SEIC - FQAL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| ISRG - FQAL | 69% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| LIN - FQAL | 68% Closely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| BKNG - FQAL | 66% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| BN - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| IVZ - SEIC | 75% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| AMG - SEIC | 75% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| STT - SEIC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||