Ad is loading...
FQCHX vs NHMRX
FQCHX vs NHMRX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHMRX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.57
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.03M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond I
Price$14.16
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
FQCHX vs NHMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHMRX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMRX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. FQCHX (29M). NHMRX (5.54) and FQCHX (5.45) have matching dividends . FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHMRX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHMRX (26 years). NHMRX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. NHMRX (28.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMRX: FQCHX (0) vs NHMRX (100000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.71 vs. NHMRX (1.42). NHMRX return over 5 years is better than : 16.73 vs. FQCHX (9.30).
| FQCHX | NHMRX | FQCHX / NHMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.91 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.637 | -2.518 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29M | 14.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.45 | 5.54 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.71 | 1.42 | 471% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.29 | 4.12 | 226% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.30 | 16.73 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 21.69 | - |