Ad is loading...
FQCHX vs NHMRX
FQCHX vs NHMRX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHMRX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond I
Price$14.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FQCHX vs NHMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHMRX commentary
Jan 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMRX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. FQCHX (27.8M). NHMRX pays higher dividends than FQCHX: NHMRX (5.40) vs FQCHX (4.89). FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHMRX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHMRX (26 years). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.25 vs. NHMRX (43.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMRX: FQCHX (0) vs NHMRX (100000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.99 vs. NHMRX (5.47). NHMRX return over 5 years is better than : 5.97 vs. FQCHX (0.28).
| FQCHX | NHMRX | FQCHX / NHMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.068 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.8M | 14.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 5.40 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | 5.47 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.12 | -5.25 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.28 | 5.97 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 22.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers