Ad is loading...
FQTEX vs RIDFX
FQTEX vs RIDFX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDFX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$11.81
Change+$0.12 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.2M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R5
Price$24.70
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.85B
FQTEX vs RIDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a StrongBuy and RIDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDFX has more cash in the bank: 124B vs. FQTEX (305M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDFX: FQTEX (6.06) vs RIDFX (4.12). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDFX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDFX (23 years). RIDFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIDFX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDFX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDFX (250). RIDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. FQTEX (4.40). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.50 vs. RIDFX (37.84).
| FQTEX | RIDFX | FQTEX / RIDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.31 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.415 | 1.888 | -234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 124B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.06 | 4.12 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 10.32 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.64 | 7.56 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.50 | 37.84 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.68 | - |