Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIEBX
FQTEX vs RIEBX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIEBX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets398.15M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
Price$26.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.56B
FQTEX vs RIEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Hold and RIEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIEBX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FQTEX (398M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIEBX: FQTEX (6.04) vs RIEBX (3.23). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIEBX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIEBX (11 years). RIEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIEBX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIEBX: FQTEX (0) vs RIEBX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.17 vs. RIEBX (13.02). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 75.07 vs. RIEBX (38.53).
| FQTEX | RIEBX | FQTEX / RIEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.07 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.664 | 11.508 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.04 | 3.23 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.17 | 13.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.61 | 25.27 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.07 | 38.53 | 195% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement