Ad is loading...
FQTEX vs RIEBX
FQTEX vs RIEBX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIEBX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$11.81
Change+$0.12 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.2M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
Price$24.61
Change+$0.15 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.85B
FQTEX vs RIEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIEBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a StrongBuy and RIEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIEBX has more cash in the bank: 124B vs. FQTEX (305M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIEBX: FQTEX (6.06) vs RIEBX (3.39). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIEBX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIEBX (11 years). RIEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIEBX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIEBX: FQTEX (0) vs RIEBX (250). RIEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.44 vs. FQTEX (4.40). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.50 vs. RIEBX (33.99).
| FQTEX | RIEBX | FQTEX / RIEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.07 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.415 | 1.663 | -266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 124B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.06 | 3.39 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 9.44 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.64 | 5.60 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.50 | 33.99 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...