Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIEBX
FQTEX vs RIEBX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIEBX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$12.95
Change-$0.10 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.49M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
Price$26.19
Change-$0.15 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.37B
FQTEX vs RIEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Buy and RIEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIEBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FQTEX (365M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIEBX: FQTEX (6.17) vs RIEBX (3.30). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIEBX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIEBX (11 years). RIEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIEBX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIEBX: FQTEX (0) vs RIEBX (250). RIEBX (13.14) and FQTEX (12.71) have marching annual gain over last year. FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 73.73 vs. RIEBX (39.54).
| FQTEX | RIEBX | FQTEX / RIEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.07 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.07 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.038 | 8.767 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 365M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.17 | 3.30 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.71 | 13.14 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.47 | 24.11 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.73 | 39.54 | 186% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement