Ad is loading...
FQTHX vs NHCCX
FQTHX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FQTHX vs NHCCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H Adv
Price$9.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.68M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
FQTHX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTHX vs. NHCCX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTHX is a StrongBuy and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. FQTHX (22.7M). FQTHX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: FQTHX (5.17) vs NHCCX (4.49). FQTHX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: FQTHX (6 years) vs NHCCX (11 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than FQTHX (0.87). FQTHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.17 vs. NHCCX (28.00). FQTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: FQTHX (0) vs NHCCX (3000). FQTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.54 vs. NHCCX (0.18). FQTHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. NHCCX (10.33).
| FQTHX | NHCCX | FQTHX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 2.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 2.91 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.579 | -3.272 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.7M | 14.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.17 | 4.49 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 0.18 | 1,966% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.03 | 0.03 | 29,948% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.49 | 10.33 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers