Ad is loading...
FQTHX vs NHMFX
FQTHX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts FQTHX vs NHMFX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H Adv
Price$9.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.68M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$14.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
FQTHX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTHX vs. NHMFX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTHX is a StrongBuy and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. FQTHX (22.7M). NHMFX pays higher dividends than FQTHX: NHMFX (5.58) vs FQTHX (5.17). FQTHX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: FQTHX (6 years) vs NHMFX (9 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than FQTHX (0.87). FQTHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.17 vs. NHMFX (28.00). FQTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: FQTHX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). FQTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.54 vs. NHMFX (1.24). FQTHX (16.49) and NHMFX (16.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FQTHX | NHMFX | FQTHX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.87 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.87 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.579 | -2.984 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.7M | 14.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.17 | 5.58 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 1.24 | 286% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.03 | 3.18 | 253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.49 | 16.29 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |