Ad is loading...
FQTHX vs NHMRX
FQTHX vs NHMRX Comparison
Open Charts FQTHX vs NHMRX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H Adv
Price$9.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.68M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond I
Price$14.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
FQTHX vs NHMRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTHX vs. NHMRX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTHX is a StrongBuy and NHMRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMRX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. FQTHX (22.7M). NHMRX pays higher dividends than FQTHX: NHMRX (5.54) vs FQTHX (5.17). FQTHX was incepted earlier than NHMRX: FQTHX (6 years) vs NHMRX (26 years). NHMRX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FQTHX (0.87). FQTHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.17 vs. NHMRX (28.00). FQTHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMRX: FQTHX (0) vs NHMRX (100000). FQTHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.54 vs. NHMRX (1.13). FQTHX (16.49) and NHMRX (16.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FQTHX | NHMRX | FQTHX / NHMRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.91 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.579 | -3.000 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.7M | 14.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.17 | 5.54 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 1.13 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.03 | 3.09 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.49 | 16.15 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...