Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQUAX vs VTSMX
FQUAX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts FQUAX vs VTSMX
AMG River Road Large Cap Value Select N
Price$20.48
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.81M
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$143.62
Change+$1.51 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
FQUAX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQUAX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQUAX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. FQUAX (51.8M). VTSMX pays higher dividends than FQUAX: VTSMX (1.18) vs FQUAX (0.53). FQUAX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: FQUAX (19 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). FQUAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). FQUAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). FQUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: FQUAX (2000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.96 vs. FQUAX (9.52). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 80.94 vs. FQUAX (72.00).
| FQUAX | VTSMX | FQUAX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.14 | 679% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.14 | 821% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.046 | 0.817 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.8M | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.18 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.52 | 10.96 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.97 | 40.34 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.00 | 80.94 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.12 | 179.94 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement