FQVLF
Price
$18.43
Change
-$0.04 (-0.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.45B
18 days until earnings call
LSANF
Price
$4.35
Change
-$0.13 (-2.90%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
256.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FQVLF vs LSANF

Header iconFQVLF vs LSANF Comparison
Open Charts FQVLF vs LSANFBanner chart's image
First Quantum Minerals
Price$18.43
Change-$0.04 (-0.22%)
Volume$102.79K
Capitalization20.45B
Los Andes Copper
Price$4.35
Change-$0.13 (-2.90%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization256.54M
FQVLF vs LSANF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FQVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FQVLF vs. LSANF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQVLF is a Hold and LSANF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FQVLF: $18.43 vs. LSANF: $4.35)
Brand notoriety: FQVLF and LSANF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FQVLF: 31% vs. LSANF: 104%
Market capitalization -- FQVLF: $20.45B vs. LSANF: $256.54M
FQVLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.45B. LSANF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $256.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FQVLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLSANF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FQVLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LSANF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FQVLF is a better buy in the long-term than LSANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FQVLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSANF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FQVLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LSANF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSANF is a better buy in the short-term than FQVLF.

Price Growth

FQVLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.84% price change this week, while LSANF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

FQVLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQVLF($20.5B) has a higher market cap than LSANF($257M). FQVLF YTD gains are higher at: 42.647 vs. LSANF (-20.183). FQVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.32B vs. LSANF (-5.59M). FQVLF has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. LSANF (1.91M). LSANF has less debt than FQVLF: LSANF (4.29M) vs FQVLF (6.74B). FQVLF has higher revenues than LSANF: FQVLF (6.77B) vs LSANF (0).
FQVLFLSANFFQVLF / LSANF
Capitalization20.5B257M7,977%
EBITDA2.32B-5.59M-41,455%
Gain YTD42.647-20.183-211%
P/E Ratio50.76N/A-
Revenue6.77B0-
Total Cash1.09B1.91M57,075%
Total Debt6.74B4.29M156,976%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FQVLF vs LSANF: Fundamental Ratings
FQVLF
LSANF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6876
SMR RATING
1..100
8878
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3883
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2291
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSANF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVLF (80). This means that LSANF’s stock grew similarly to FQVLF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as LSANF (76). This means that FQVLF’s stock grew similarly to LSANF’s over the last 12 months.

LSANF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVLF (88). This means that LSANF’s stock grew similarly to FQVLF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVLF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSANF (83). This means that FQVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSANF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVLF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LSANF (91). This means that FQVLF’s stock grew significantly faster than LSANF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FQVLFLSANF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FQVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USAWX32.190.17
+0.53%
Victory Sustainable World
OFAFX27.710.09
+0.33%
Olstein All Cap Value Adv
TMCTX55.340.18
+0.33%
Touchstone Mid Cap Z
LHCFX18.590.04
+0.22%
Lord Abbett Health Care F
CREYX9.790.02
+0.20%
Columbia Real Estate Equity Inst3

FQVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQVLF has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FQVLF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVLF
1D Price
Change %
FQVLF100%
-0.22%
HBM - FQVLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
CSCCF - FQVLF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
IVPAF - FQVLF
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
SCCO - FQVLF
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
LUNMF - FQVLF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
More

LSANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSANF and FQVLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSANF and FQVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSANF
1D Price
Change %
LSANF100%
N/A
FQVLF - LSANF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
LUNMF - LSANF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
LYSCF - LSANF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
LTMCF - LSANF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.74%
LYSDY - LSANF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More