FQVLF
Price
$13.86
Change
+$0.10 (+0.73%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.45B
92 days until earnings call
LUNMF
Price
$8.70
Change
-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FQVLF vs LUNMF

Header iconFQVLF vs LUNMF Comparison
Open Charts FQVLF vs LUNMFBanner chart's image
First Quantum Minerals
Price$13.86
Change+$0.10 (+0.73%)
Volume$481.63K
Capitalization20.45B
Lundin Mining
Price$8.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Volume$54.9K
Capitalization6.88B
FQVLF vs LUNMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FQVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FQVLF vs. LUNMF commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQVLF is a Buy and LUNMF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FQVLF: $13.86 vs. LUNMF: $8.70)
Brand notoriety: FQVLF and LUNMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FQVLF: 29% vs. LUNMF: 28%
Market capitalization -- FQVLF: $20.45B vs. LUNMF: $6.88B
FQVLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $20.45B. LUNMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FQVLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLUNMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FQVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LUNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the long-term than FQVLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FQVLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUNMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FQVLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LUNMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FQVLF and LUNMF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FQVLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +15.99% price change this week, while LUNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +14.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FQVLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

LUNMF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.82% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQVLF($20.5B) has a higher market cap than LUNMF($6.88B). FQVLF has higher P/E ratio than LUNMF: FQVLF (50.76) vs LUNMF (31.55). FQVLF YTD gains are higher at: 7.276 vs. LUNMF (1.045). FQVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.32B vs. LUNMF (903M). FQVLF has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. LUNMF (184M). LUNMF has less debt than FQVLF: LUNMF (215M) vs FQVLF (6.74B). FQVLF has higher revenues than LUNMF: FQVLF (6.77B) vs LUNMF (2.8B).
FQVLFLUNMFFQVLF / LUNMF
Capitalization20.5B6.88B298%
EBITDA2.32B903M257%
Gain YTD7.2761.045696%
P/E Ratio50.7631.55161%
Revenue6.77B2.8B242%
Total Cash1.09B184M592%
Total Debt6.74B215M3,134%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FQVLF vs LUNMF: Fundamental Ratings
FQVLF
LUNMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7153
SMR RATING
1..100
9091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
451
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FQVLF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as LUNMF (50). This means that FQVLF’s stock grew similarly to LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVLF (71). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew similarly to FQVLF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVLF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as LUNMF (91). This means that FQVLF’s stock grew similarly to LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVLF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as LUNMF (59). This means that FQVLF’s stock grew similarly to LUNMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVLF (45). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FQVLFLUNMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FQVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTCYX17.530.14
+0.81%
BNY Mellon Sust US Equity Y
WFIOX50.430.37
+0.74%
Allspring Index Admin
RYWAX46.71N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth H
GICAX13.68-0.01
-0.07%
Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts A
CAMYX27.81-0.14
-0.50%
Cambiar International Equity Instl

FQVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQVLF has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FQVLF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVLF
1D Price
Change %
FQVLF100%
+0.73%
HBM - FQVLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
CSCCF - FQVLF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
IVPAF - FQVLF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
SCCO - FQVLF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
LUNMF - FQVLF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More

LUNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNMF has been closely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUNMF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNMF
1D Price
Change %
LUNMF100%
-0.11%
HBM - LUNMF
80%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
FCX - LUNMF
78%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
SCCO - LUNMF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
IVPAF - LUNMF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
TECK - LUNMF
74%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
More