It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileORRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.30% price change this week, while ORRF (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.55%.
FRAF is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.
ORRF is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
FRAF | ORRF | FRAF / ORRF | |
Capitalization | 113M | 287M | 39% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 5.241 | 27.721 | 19% |
P/E Ratio | 8.33 | 7.62 | 109% |
Revenue | 67.3M | 129M | 52% |
Total Cash | 20.1M | 34.7M | 58% |
Total Debt | 154M | 170M | 91% |
FRAF | ORRF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 30 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRAF's Valuation (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORRF (72). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORRF’s over the last 12 months.
ORRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRAF (83). This means that ORRF’s stock grew significantly faster than FRAF’s over the last 12 months.
ORRF's SMR Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (42). This means that ORRF’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.
ORRF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (50). This means that ORRF’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.
ORRF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRAF (54). This means that ORRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRAF’s over the last 12 months.
FRAF | ORRF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago53% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago61% | 28 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago51% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago61% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with ORRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then ORRF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FRAF | 100% | -3.24% | ||
ORRF - FRAF | 36% Loosely correlated | -4.71% | ||
FUNC - FRAF | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.86% | ||
CHMG - FRAF | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.72% | ||
MRBK - FRAF | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.89% | ||
FCCO - FRAF | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.90% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ORRF has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ORRF jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ORRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ORRF | 100% | -4.71% | ||
SHBI - ORRF | 81% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
FCF - ORRF | 80% Closely correlated | -5.38% | ||
NWBI - ORRF | 80% Closely correlated | -5.73% | ||
CTBI - ORRF | 79% Closely correlated | -5.89% | ||
SMBC - ORRF | 79% Closely correlated | -5.62% | ||
More |