Ad is loading...
FRBCX vs RMBNX
FRBCX vs RMBNX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs RMBNX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$25.21
Change-$0.10 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets781.44M
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
Price$40.30
Change-$0.06 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.7M
FRBCX vs RMBNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. RMBNX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and RMBNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 781M vs. RMBNX (205M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than RMBNX: FRBCX (1.25) vs RMBNX (0.77). FRBCX was incepted earlier than RMBNX: FRBCX (26 years) vs RMBNX (20 years). RMBNX (2.12) is less costly to investors than FRBCX (1.97). RMBNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBNX: FRBCX (1000) vs RMBNX (2500). RMBNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.18 vs. FRBCX (7.83). RMBNX return over 5 years is better than : 81.11 vs. FRBCX (56.77).
| FRBCX | RMBNX | FRBCX / RMBNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.12 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 2.12 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.172 | -6.096 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 781M | 205M | 381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.77 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.83 | 15.18 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.01 | -7.58 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.77 | 81.11 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.25 | 53.74 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers