Ad is loading...
FREKF
Price
$17.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
PALT
Price
$1.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
127 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FREKF vs PALT

Header iconFREKF vs PALT Comparison
Open Charts FREKF vs PALTBanner chart's image
FREEE K K
Price$17.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.54K
CapitalizationN/A
Paltalk
Price$1.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$64.09K
CapitalizationN/A
FREKF vs PALT Comparison Chart
Loading...
PALT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FREKF vs. PALT commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FREKF is a Hold and PALT is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FREKF: $17.00 vs. PALT: $1.83)
Brand notoriety: FREKF and PALT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FREKF: 206% vs. PALT: 106%
Market capitalization -- FREKF: $1.28B vs. PALT: $28.22M
FREKF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.28B. PALT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $28.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FREKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePALT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FREKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PALT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PALT is a better buy in the long-term than FREKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PALT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PALT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FREKF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.53% price change this week, while PALT (@Packaged Software) price change was -14.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

PALT is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FREKF($1.28B) has a higher market cap than PALT($28.2M). FREKF YTD gains are higher at: -15.381 vs. PALT (-21.795). PALT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.17M vs. FREKF (-17.89B). FREKF has more cash in the bank: 37.3B vs. PALT (13.6M). PALT has less debt than FREKF: PALT (77K) vs FREKF (119M). FREKF has higher revenues than PALT: FREKF (17.7B) vs PALT (11M).
FREKFPALTFREKF / PALT
Capitalization1.28B28.2M4,521%
EBITDA-17.89B-1.17M1,535,018%
Gain YTD-15.381-21.79571%
P/E RatioN/A14.12-
Revenue17.7B11M160,909%
Total Cash37.3B13.6M274,265%
Total Debt119M77K154,545%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PALT: Fundamental Ratings
PALT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PALT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PALT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NQVCX52.15-0.19
-0.36%
Nuveen Multi Cap Value C
MKVGX14.14-0.09
-0.63%
MFS International Large Cap Value R4
WSBFX23.39-0.21
-0.89%
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
CUSRX15.16-0.21
-1.37%
Cullen Small Cap Value Retail
OMSCX24.52-0.38
-1.53%
Invesco Main Street All Cap C

FREKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FREKF and SQNXF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FREKF and SQNXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FREKF
1D Price
Change %
FREKF100%
N/A
SQNXF - FREKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.46%
SNAL - FREKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
PALT - FREKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPLFF - FREKF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOPA - FREKF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More

PALT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PALT and ESTC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PALT and ESTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PALT
1D Price
Change %
PALT100%
N/A
ESTC - PALT
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.26%
GTLB - PALT
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
DUOL - PALT
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.73%
ALLT - PALT
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.16%
DDI - PALT
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
More