It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRFHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLRE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRFHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLRE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRFHF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.73% price change this week, while GLRE (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -6.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.58%.
FRFHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
GLRE is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
FRFHF | GLRE | FRFHF / GLRE | |
Capitalization | 19.7B | 437M | 4,508% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 53.982 | 26.445 | 204% |
P/E Ratio | 11.39 | 4.95 | 230% |
Revenue | 27.5B | 638M | 4,310% |
Total Cash | 10.2B | 51.1M | 19,961% |
Total Debt | 8.72B | 73.3M | 11,894% |
FRFHF | GLRE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRFHF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GLRE (68) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to GLRE’s over the last 12 months.
FRFHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLRE (41) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLRE’s over the last 12 months.
GLRE's SMR Rating (63) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRFHF (98) in the null industry. This means that GLRE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.
FRFHF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as GLRE (47) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to GLRE’s over the last 12 months.
GLRE's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (26) in the null industry. This means that GLRE’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.
FRFHF | GLRE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago61% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago49% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago49% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 16 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago56% | 2 days ago49% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago72% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRFHF has been loosely correlated with EG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRFHF jumps, then EG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRFHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FRFHF | 100% | -0.44% | ||
EG - FRFHF | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
GLRE - FRFHF | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
RGA - FRFHF | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
L - FRFHF | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
IFCZF - FRFHF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLRE has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLRE jumps, then L could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GLRE | 100% | -0.96% | ||
L - GLRE | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
AFG - GLRE | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
MHLD - GLRE | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
STC - GLRE | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
UFCS - GLRE | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
More |