FRFHF
Price
$1284.76
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
8 days until earnings call
RGA
Price
$213.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRFHF vs RGA

Header iconFRFHF vs RGA Comparison
Open Charts FRFHF vs RGABanner chart's image
Fairfax Financial Holdings
Price$1284.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.23K
CapitalizationN/A
Reinsurance Group of America
Price$213.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$227.29K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FRFHF vs RGA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRFHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FRFHF vs. RGA commentary
Oct 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRFHF is a StrongBuy and RGA is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 24, 2024
Stock price -- (FRFHF: $1255.57 vs. RGA: $213.32)
Brand notoriety: FRFHF and RGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRFHF: 46% vs. RGA: 82%
Market capitalization -- FRFHF: $19.66B vs. RGA: $12.68B
FRFHF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $19.66B. RGA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $12.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRFHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRFHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRFHF and RGA are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRFHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRFHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGA is a better buy in the short-term than FRFHF.

Price Growth

FRFHF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.68% price change this week, while RGA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRFHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

RGA is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.83% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRFHF($19.7B) has a higher market cap than RGA($12.7B). RGA has higher P/E ratio than FRFHF: RGA (14.50) vs FRFHF (11.39). FRFHF YTD gains are higher at: 38.579 vs. RGA (33.657). RGA has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FRFHF (10.2B). RGA has less debt than FRFHF: RGA (4.43B) vs FRFHF (8.72B). FRFHF has higher revenues than RGA: FRFHF (27.5B) vs RGA (18.3B).
FRFHFRGAFRFHF / RGA
Capitalization19.7B12.7B155%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.57933.657115%
P/E Ratio11.3914.5079%
Revenue27.5B18.3B150%
Total Cash10.2B12.1B84%
Total Debt8.72B4.43B197%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRFHF vs RGA: Fundamental Ratings
FRFHF
RGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
557
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
444
SMR RATING
1..100
9896
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4634
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGA's Valuation (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (58) in the null industry. This means that RGA’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGA (44) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGA’s over the last 12 months.

RGA's SMR Rating (96) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (98) in the null industry. This means that RGA’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RGA (48) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to RGA’s over the last 12 months.

RGA's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (46) in the null industry. This means that RGA’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRFHFRGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRFHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL235.860.86
+0.37%
Apple
BTC.X67361.410000-6.445312
-0.01%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY583.32-1.27
-0.22%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA217.97-2.73
-1.24%
Tesla
GME20.93-0.29
-1.37%
GameStop Corp

FRFHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRFHF has been loosely correlated with EG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRFHF jumps, then EG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRFHF
1D Price
Change %
FRFHF100%
+0.12%
EG - FRFHF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
RGA - FRFHF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
GLRE - FRFHF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
L - FRFHF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
IFCZF - FRFHF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More