FRHC
Price
$172.73
Change
+$2.18 (+1.28%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.57B
12 days until earnings call
GRAF
Price
$10.51
Change
+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
305.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRHC vs GRAF

Header iconFRHC vs GRAF Comparison
Open Charts FRHC vs GRAFBanner chart's image
Freedom Holding
Price$172.73
Change+$2.18 (+1.28%)
Volume$101.67K
Capitalization10.57B
Graf Global
Price$10.51
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Volume$8.78K
Capitalization305.34M
FRHC vs GRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHC vs. GRAF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHC is a StrongBuy and GRAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHC: $172.73 vs. GRAF: $10.51)
Brand notoriety: FRHC and GRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHC: 56% vs. GRAF: 84%
Market capitalization -- FRHC: $10.57B vs. GRAF: $305.34M
FRHC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $10.57B. GRAF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $305.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHC is a better buy in the long-term than GRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GRAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRHC is a better buy in the short-term than GRAF.

Price Growth

FRHC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -3.42% price change this week, while GRAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.

GRAF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.92% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHC($10.6B) has a higher market cap than GRAF($305M). FRHC has higher P/E ratio than GRAF: FRHC (123.38) vs GRAF (115.54). FRHC YTD gains are higher at: 32.168 vs. GRAF (4.163). FRHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 666M vs. GRAF (-1.18M). FRHC has more cash in the bank: 3.59B vs. GRAF (383K). GRAF has less debt than FRHC: GRAF (0) vs FRHC (1.95B). FRHC has higher revenues than GRAF: FRHC (2.03B) vs GRAF (0).
FRHCGRAFFRHC / GRAF
Capitalization10.6B305M3,475%
EBITDA666M-1.18M-56,556%
Gain YTD32.1684.163773%
P/E Ratio123.38115.54107%
Revenue2.03B0-
Total Cash3.59B383K936,292%
Total Debt1.95B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHC: Fundamental Ratings
FRHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
32

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHCGRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRWSX27.120.08
+0.30%
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R2
FSCNX16.520.01
+0.06%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% C
MFWBX18.30-0.02
-0.11%
MFS Global Total Return B
VTPSX151.41-0.27
-0.18%
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Idx InstlPls
TMLAX8.69-0.03
-0.34%
Transamerica Energy Infrastructure A

FRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHC has been loosely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRHC jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHC
1D Price
Change %
FRHC100%
+1.28%
JEF - FRHC
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
TIGR - FRHC
44%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
VOYA - FRHC
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
HOOD - FRHC
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.86%
IBKR - FRHC
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

GRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRAF and EMCGU have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRAF and EMCGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAF
1D Price
Change %
GRAF100%
N/A
EMCGU - GRAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVACU - GRAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPOD - GRAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
FRHC - GRAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
VOYA - GRAF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More