It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRHC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +6.83% price change this week, while IX (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.76%.
FRHC is expected to report earnings on Jun 12, 2025.
IX is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
FRHC | IX | FRHC / IX | |
Capitalization | 7.66B | 20.6B | 37% |
EBITDA | 926M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -3.298 | -11.983 | 28% |
P/E Ratio | 23.58 | 7.95 | 297% |
Revenue | 2.08B | 1.88T | 0% |
Total Cash | 4.41B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 2.71B | 6.51T | 0% |
FRHC | IX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IX's Valuation (21) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRHC (73) in the null industry. This means that IX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRHC’s over the last 12 months.
FRHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as IX (14) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew similarly to IX’s over the last 12 months.
IX's SMR Rating (1) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRHC (34) in the null industry. This means that IX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRHC’s over the last 12 months.
FRHC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IX (74) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than IX’s over the last 12 months.
FRHC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IX (86) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew significantly faster than IX’s over the last 12 months.
FRHC | IX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago89% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago69% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago34% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago43% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago44% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago41% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago75% | 20 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago64% | 6 days ago49% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago58% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
RNEM | 49.89 | 0.78 | +1.59% |
First Trust Emerging Markets Eq Sel ETF | |||
UDN | 18.28 | 0.17 | +0.94% |
Invesco DB US Dollar Bearish | |||
BCX | 8.45 | 0.03 | +0.36% |
Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust | |||
SPTS | 29.16 | -0.04 | -0.14% |
SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | |||
PMX | 6.55 | -0.03 | -0.41% |
PIMCO Municipal Income Fund III |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHC has been loosely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRHC jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FRHC | 100% | +3.31% | ||
JEF - FRHC | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
TIGR - FRHC | 44% Loosely correlated | +4.63% | ||
VOYA - FRHC | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
HOOD - FRHC | 39% Loosely correlated | +7.83% | ||
IX - FRHC | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IX has been loosely correlated with NMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IX jumps, then NMR could also see price increases.