FRHC
Price
$127.67
Change
-$0.14 (-0.11%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.74B
MLACU
Price
$10.21
Change
+$0.04 (+0.39%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

FRHC vs MLACU

Header iconFRHC vs MLACU Comparison
Open Charts FRHC vs MLACUBanner chart's image
Freedom Holding
Price$127.67
Change-$0.14 (-0.11%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.74B
Mountain Lake Acquisition
Price$10.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FRHC vs MLACU Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHC vs. MLACU commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHC is a Buy and MLACU is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHC: $127.60 vs. MLACU: $10.18)
Brand notoriety: FRHC and MLACU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHC: 113% vs. MLACU: 1%
Market capitalization -- FRHC: $7.74B vs. MLACU: $0
FRHC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $7.74B. MLACU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMLACU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MLACU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHC is a better buy in the long-term than MLACU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FRHC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -12.52% price change this week, while MLACU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.42% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLACU YTD gains are higher at: 1.509 vs. FRHC (-2.364). FRHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 926M vs. MLACU (-1.84M). FRHC has more cash in the bank: 4.41B vs. MLACU (108K). MLACU has less debt than FRHC: MLACU (3.38M) vs FRHC (2.71B). FRHC has higher revenues than MLACU: FRHC (2.08B) vs MLACU (0).
FRHCMLACUFRHC / MLACU
Capitalization7.74BN/A-
EBITDA926M-1.84M-50,233%
Gain YTD-2.3641.509-157%
P/E Ratio23.81N/A-
Revenue2.08B0-
Total Cash4.41B108K4,085,185%
Total Debt2.71B3.38M80,172%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHC: Fundamental Ratings
FRHC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X78532.000000-2069.039000
-2.57%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY560.58-15.34
-2.66%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL227.48-11.59
-4.85%
Apple
GME22.42-1.58
-6.58%
GameStop Corp
TSLA222.15-40.52
-15.43%
Tesla

FRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHC has been loosely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRHC jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHC
1D Price
Change %
FRHC100%
-5.55%
JEF - FRHC
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.71%
TIGR - FRHC
44%
Loosely correlated
-7.88%
HOOD - FRHC
39%
Loosely correlated
-19.81%
IBKR - FRHC
32%
Poorly correlated
-12.96%
NDAQ - FRHC
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
More

MLACU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLACU and BEEP have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLACU and BEEP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLACU
1D Price
Change %
MLACU100%
N/A
BEEP - MLACU
32%
Poorly correlated
-5.03%
BEAG - MLACU
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
FRHC - MLACU
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
PLMIU - MLACU
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABL - MLACU
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
More