FRHC
Price
$154.71
Change
+$2.45 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.39B
7 days until earnings call
SPXCF
Price
$10.86
Change
+$0.66 (+6.47%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRHC vs SPXCF

Header iconFRHC vs SPXCF Comparison
Open Charts FRHC vs SPXCFBanner chart's image
Freedom Holding
Price$154.71
Change+$2.45 (+1.61%)
Volume$598
Capitalization9.39B
Singapore Exchange
Price$10.86
Change+$0.66 (+6.47%)
Volume$360
Capitalization7.76B
FRHC vs SPXCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHC vs. SPXCF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHC is a Buy and SPXCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHC: $152.26 vs. SPXCF: $10.86)
Brand notoriety: FRHC and SPXCF are both not notable
FRHC represents the Financial Conglomerates, while SPXCF is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHC: 142% vs. SPXCF: 9%
Market capitalization -- FRHC: $9.23B vs. SPXCF: $7.76B
FRHC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $9.23B. SPXCF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.53B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXCF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SPXCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRHC and SPXCF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FRHC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while SPXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +3.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.00%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +91.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+3.16% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHC($9.39B) has a higher market cap than SPXCF($7.76B). FRHC has higher P/E ratio than SPXCF: FRHC (28.91) vs SPXCF (20.37). SPXCF YTD gains are higher at: 20.687 vs. FRHC (16.505). FRHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 926M vs. SPXCF (724M). FRHC has more cash in the bank: 4.41B vs. SPXCF (1.04B). SPXCF has less debt than FRHC: SPXCF (721M) vs FRHC (2.71B). FRHC has higher revenues than SPXCF: FRHC (2.08B) vs SPXCF (1.15B).
FRHCSPXCFFRHC / SPXCF
Capitalization9.39B7.76B121%
EBITDA926M724M128%
Gain YTD16.50520.68780%
P/E Ratio28.9120.37142%
Revenue2.08B1.15B181%
Total Cash4.41B1.04B426%
Total Debt2.71B721M376%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHC vs SPXCF: Fundamental Ratings
FRHC
SPXCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1869
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
831
SMR RATING
1..100
3418
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRHC's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCF (93). This means that FRHC’s stock grew similarly to SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCF (31). This means that FRHC’s stock grew similarly to SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHC (34). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew similarly to FRHC’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCF (50). This means that FRHC’s stock grew similarly to SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCF (22). This means that FRHC’s stock grew similarly to SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AWPAX20.74N/A
N/A
AB Sustainable Intl Thematic A
FLPKX42.06N/A
N/A
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
FNCRX29.02N/A
N/A
Franklin Natural Resources C
ATGYX43.54N/A
N/A
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp Inst
ATGGX13.78N/A
N/A
American Century International Gr R5

FRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHC has been loosely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRHC jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHC
1D Price
Change %
FRHC100%
-3.15%
JEF - FRHC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
TIGR - FRHC
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
VOYA - FRHC
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
HOOD - FRHC
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
IBKR - FRHC
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
More

SPXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXCF and SPXCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXCF and SPXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXCF
1D Price
Change %
SPXCF100%
+6.49%
SPXCY - SPXCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
OLKR - SPXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRHC - SPXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.15%
QMCI - SPXCF
13%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
PLSQF - SPXCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More