FRHC vs UMAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHC is a StrongBuy and UMAC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUMAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UMAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRHC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRHC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- UMAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FRHC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -10.13% price change this week, while UMAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -20.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRHC is expected to report earnings on Jun 12, 2025.
UMAC is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-1.29% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| FRHC | UMAC | FRHC / UMAC | |
| Capitalization | 7.17B | 15.9M | 45,101% |
| EBITDA | 926M | -1.79M | -51,765% |
| Gain YTD | -9.484 | -68.430 | 14% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.07 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.08B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 4.41B | 895K | 492,961% |
| Total Debt | 2.71B | N/A | - |
FRHC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FRHC | UMAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 14 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UTHY | 44.18 | 0.46 | +1.05% |
| US Treasury 30 Year Bond ETF | |||
| SPTS | 29.28 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
| SPDR® Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF | |||
| IBDY | 25.61 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Corp ETF | |||
| BSMR | 23.62 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2027 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| THLV | 25.79 | -0.75 | -2.84% |
| THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | |||
FRHC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHC has been loosely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRHC jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRHC | 100% | -7.30% | ||
| JEF - FRHC | 59% Loosely correlated | -10.03% | ||
| TIGR - FRHC | 44% Loosely correlated | -12.77% | ||
| HOOD - FRHC | 39% Loosely correlated | -9.80% | ||
| IBKR - FRHC | 32% Poorly correlated | -8.40% | ||
| VOYA - FRHC | 32% Poorly correlated | -9.35% | ||
More | ||||
UMAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UMAC and FRHC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMAC and FRHC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMAC | 100% | -9.69% | ||
| FRHC - UMAC | 25% Poorly correlated | -7.30% | ||
| SPKLU - UMAC | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISRLU - UMAC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETD - UMAC | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AITR - UMAC | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||